Many thanks to JAYPEEDIGITAL platform, which has been an indispensable easy-to-use source for our...Ozlem YALCINKAYA
Jaypeedigital site offers to our students a huge number of medical publications such as textbooks...Dr Jesus Tapia Jurado
With user-friendly interface, Jaypeedigital provides extensive coverage in medicine, dentistry and...Wan Suhaimi Ariffin, MLS (Syracuse), BLS (UITM)`
Jaypeedigital platform presents an interesting and valuable collection of medical publications that...David E. García Díaz (MD)
Some of us teach in the Division of Graduate Studies and Research at the Faculty and the contents of...Arcelia Meléndez Ocamp (MD)
Subscribe to be the first to know about Best Deals and Exclusive Offers!
JOURNAL TITLE: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
The aim of this
Standardized MOD cavities (one cervical margin located in dentin, one in enamel) were prepared in 40 extracted human molars and divided into four groups according to the composite used to restore them (n=10/group). Group 1: Adper Single Bond2/Filtek Supreme XT; Group 2: Excite/Tetric EvoCeram; Group 3: Prime & BondNT/Ceram X; and Group 4 (control) Adper Single Bond2/Filtek Z250. Groups were further divided into subgroups A and B. The “A” subgroups represent the level of the location of the cervial margin at 1 mm coronal to the CEJ, and the “B” subgroups represent the level of the cervical margin located 1 mm apical to the CEJ. After restoration of the cavities with nanocomposites, thermocycling, and immersion in 0.5% basic fuchsin, the dye penetration and internal voids were evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests with the Bonferroni correction for microleakage and with the Chi-square test for internal voids (p<0.05).
The microleakage in the A subgroups was statistically significantly lower then B subgroups (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed in terms of interface, cervical, and occlusal voids for all groups (p>0.05). No significant difference was observed between each group for three voids in all groups (p>0.05).
The location of the gingival margin affects the microleakage of nanocomposites but has no significant affect on the internal voids.
Gingival margin located 1 mm coronal to the CEJ provided a reduction in cervical microleakage in nanocomposite restorations.
Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N. Influence of Location of the Gingival Margin on the Microleakage and Internal Voids of Nanocomposites. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 November; (9)7:065-072.
© 2019 Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD. | All Rights Reserved