Effect of Dental Prophylaxis Techniques on the Surface Roughness of Resin Composites

JOURNAL TITLE: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Author
1. Isabella A Gomes
2. Hevylla Mendes
3. Etevaldo M Maia Filho
4. Claudia de C Rizzi
5. Mario G Nina
6. Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez
7. Cecilia P Turssi
8. Ana JC Vasconcelos
ISSN
DOI
10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2208
Volume
19
Issue
1
Publishing Year
0
Pages
5
Author Affiliations
    1. Department of Postgraduate in Dentistry, CEUMA University, São Luis, Maranhão, Brazil
    1. Department of Dentistry, Ceuma University, São Luis Maranhão, Brazil
    1. Department of Dentistry, Ceuma University, São Luis Maranhão, Brazil
    1. Department of Dentistry, Ceuma University, São Luis Maranhão, Brazil
    1. Department of Dentistry, Ceuma University, São Luis Maranhão, Brazil
    1. Department of Dentistry, Ceuma University, São Luis Maranhão, Brazil
    1. Department of Dentistry, São Leopoldo Mandic University Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
    1. Department of Dentistry, Ceuma University, São Luis Maranhão, Brazil
  • Article keywords

    Abstract

    Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of dental prophylaxis techniques on surface roughness of composite resins. Materials and methods: A total of 36 nanohybrid resin composite test specimens were fabricated and divided into three groups (n = 12). They were kept in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours and submitted to the finishing and polishing technique. For the prophylactic techniques, in group G1, a mixture of pumice stone and distilled water was used with the aid of a rubber cup; in group G2, Herjos-F prophy paste was used with a rubber cup; and in group G3, a bicarbonate jet spray was used. Afterward, all the samples were repolished using the Soflex pop-on disks. A roughness meter was used to measure surface roughness at three points in time: Before the prophylactic techniques (1st evaluation), afterward (2nd evaluation), and following repeat polishing (3rd evaluation). Results: It was found that roughness values changed significantly between the 1st and 2nd evaluations (p < 0.05) and between the 2nd and 3rd evaluations (p < 0.05), showing that the change in roughness depended on the type of prophylactic treatment. Roughness was significantly higher after the bicarbonate jet (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Prophylaxis using the sodium bicarbonate jet significantly altered the roughness of nanoparticle-reinforced resin. Clinical significance: Dental prophylaxis is the most common practice employed to remove bacterial plaque and other coatings. However, one side effect of the cleaning may be a rougher surface subject to degradation and staining. The correct use of prophylactic devices and avoiding prolonged use on resin restorations reduce surface roughness.

    © 2019 Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.   |   All Rights Reserved