Quantitative Evaluation and Comparison of Stress Transmission Characteristics of Bar-Clip and Short Coping Overdenture Attachments Under Dynamic Loading: A Photoelastic Stress Analysis

JOURNAL TITLE: The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Author
1. Anurag Gupta
2. Alok Dwivedi
3. Rajesh Vyas
ISSN
DOI
10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1315
Volume
14
Issue
2
Publishing Year
2013
Pages
6
Author Affiliations
    1. Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
    1. Department of Dentistry, College of Applied Medical Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
  • Article keywords

    Abstract

    Statement of problem

    When two canine abutment teeth are used to support an overdenture prosthesis, optimal stress distribution to minimize forces to abutments is desired.

    Purpose

    This study used photoelastic stress analysis to compare the stress patterns generated around canine abutments using two different overdenture retainer designs.

    Materials and methods

    Two canine abutments were anchored in the photoelastic mandible and overdentures were fabricated using two different overdenture attachments. The fitting surface of dentures were lined with resilient layer of light bodied silicon rubberbase impression material to simulate oral mucosa. The attachments used were Bar-Clip and Short coping type. Verticalload of 5 to 50 lb was applied by jaw simulator. Resultant stress fringes were photographed and evaluated quantitatively.

    Results

    Bar-Clip type of attachment transmitted more amount of stress than short coping type transmitted. There was gross difference in magnitude of stresses between two types of retainers.

    Conclusion

    As the retentivity of the attachment increased there was more stress concentration around the abutments.

    How to cite this article

    Dwivedi A, Vyas R, Gupta A. Quantitative Evaluation and Comparison of Stress Transmission Characteristics of Bar-Clip and Short Coping Overdenture Attachments Under Dynamic Loading: A Photoelastic Stress Analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(2):287-292.

    © 2019 Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.   |   All Rights Reserved