Morphometric Evaluation of the Middle Turbinate in Relation to Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

JOURNAL TITLE: Clinical Rhinology

Author
1. Tulika Gupta
2. Daisy Sahni
3. Anjali Aggarwal
ISSN
0974-4630
DOI
10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1128
Volume
5
Issue
3
Publishing Year
2012
Pages
4
Author Affiliations
    1. Department of Anatomy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh India
    1. Department of Anatomy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
  • Article keywords
    Middle turbinate resection, Endoscopic sinus surgery, Limen nasi

    Abstract

    Objective

    Partial middle turbinectomy during endoscopic sinus surgery is done for better access and to avoid postoperative complications of lateralization of the middle turbinate. There are only few cadaveric studies available in literature describing the middle turbinate morphometry with surgical perspective. Therefore, the present study was planned to record morphometry and relevant surgical distances for the middle turbinate.

    Materials and methods

    Thirty-two midsagittal sections of cadaver heads from adult males were dissected. Middle turbinate measurements and shapes were taken. Reference distances and angles were measured.

    Results

    The average length of the middle turbinate was 20.4 ± 3.9 mm, while the height of the middle turbinate was taken at three specific points (13.1, 9.7, 6.1 mm). The most common shape found was the type 2. The mean value for the distance between limen nasi and the anterior and posterior attachments of the middle turbinate was found to be 32.1 ± 3.2 mm, with mean angle of 65o with the horizontal and 43.6 ± 4.2 mm, with mean angle of 39.4o with the horizontal respectively.

    Conclusion

    This baseline data may aid endoscopic surgeons in better planning and execution of the middle turbinate resection.

    How to cite this article

    Gupta T, Aggarwal A, Sahni D. Morphometric Evaluation of the Middle Turbinate in Relation to Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Clin Rhinol An Int J 2012;5(3): 103-106.

    © 2019 Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.   |   All Rights Reserved