Postoperative Complications Followed by Septoplasty Comparison between Conventional Nasal Packing and Glove Finger Pack

JOURNAL TITLE: Clinical Rhinology

Author
1. Aamir Yousuf
2. Zafarullah Beigh
3. Manzoor Ahmad Malik
4. Rafiq Ahmad
ISSN
0974-4630
DOI
10.5005/jp-journals-10013-1107
Volume
5
Issue
1
Publishing Year
2012
Pages
3
Author Affiliations
    1. Department of ENT and HNS, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
    1. Department of ENT, Government Medical College, Srinagar Jammu & Kashmir, India
    1. Department of ENT, Government Medical College, Srinagar Jammu & Kashmir, India
  • Article keywords
    Septoplasty, Glove finger pack, Conventional nasal pack

    Abstract

    Objective

    Objective of this study is to compare complications in postseptoplasty patients using conventional nasal packing and glove finger packing.

    Materials and methods

    In our study 95 patients who underwent septoplasty were enrolled and written consent taken for the study among these 95 patients, 50 patients were put in group A and 45 patients in group B. In group A patients glove finger packing was done and in group B patients conventional packing using medicated gauze was done and postoperative complications like postoperative pain, hemorrhage, septal perforation, toxic shock syndrome, septal hematoma, septal deviation and synechia/adhesion bands were compared between two groups, follow-up was done for both groups for 3 weeks.

    Result

    Our study showed that their was significantly less pain in group A patients and also their was less incidence of synechia in group A patients as compared to group B patients, their was not much difference in other complications.

    Conclusion

    Our results point out that glove finger pack has more advantage than conventional medicated gauze pack. We recommend use of glove finger pack after septoplasty procedure.

    How to cite this article

    Beigh Z, Yousuf A, Malik MA, Ahmad R. Postoperative Complications Followed by Septoplasty Comparison between Conventional Nasal Packing and Glove Finger Pack. Clin Rhinol Int J 2012;5(1):11-13.

    © 2019 Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.   |   All Rights Reserved